A greyed-out label above marks a link this fixed demo does not ship: only the story project's pages go this deep, and an action a live reader could take here (signing in, applying a technique) is disabled in a read-only export.

Top threats

As of 2026-07-01

Season 4 Rollout

risk — Open-risk exposure 45,000 against contingency 1,500 (top risk: Lead editor turnover mid-season). No response planned for at least one open risk. red score 8.70

Plan responses for open threats — Select avoid/mitigate/transfer/accept strategies for the largest open risks. — apply Strategies for Threats
Run a reserve analysis — Weigh contingency held against total exposure and top up if short. — apply Reserve Analysis
Prepare contingent response plans — Define trigger conditions and fallback plans for the top-ranked risks. — apply Contingent Response Strategies

integration — Overall health is red: red in schedule, quality, resource, risk. red score 8.70

Perform integrated change control — Route the cross-area impacts through one controlled change decision. — Change Control Tools (reference only — no assistant yet)
Escalate to the sponsor — Bring the red areas to the sponsor for a direction and funding call. — apply Meetings

resource — 1 person over-allocated (peak ratio 2.67 — 80 h in all, 80 h of it on this project). red score 1.67

Level or smooth the resource assignments — Re-sequence or re-assign tasks so no one's remaining hours exceed their capacity. — apply Resource Optimization
Negotiate for more capacity — Secure additional hours or headcount for the over-committed assignees. — Negotiation (reference only — no assistant yet)
Revisit pre-assignments — Check whether upcoming work was pre-assigned to people already at capacity. — apply Pre Assignment

quality — 1 quality metric outside their configured tolerance. red score 1.00

Run a quality audit — Independently review whether quality processes and standards are being followed. — apply Audits
Inspect deliverables against target metrics — Re-measure the metrics closest to, or already past, tolerance to confirm state. — apply Inspection
Run a root-cause analysis — Trace out-of-tolerance or stale metrics back to the process defect driving them. — apply Root Cause Analysis

schedule — Schedule slipping (SPI 0.95, 1 milestone slipped: Sizzle reel delivery). red score 0.25 +0.0478

Compress the schedule — Crash or fast-track remaining work to recover the lost time. — apply Schedule Compression
Re-baseline the critical path — Re-run the critical path method against current progress and slipped milestones. — apply Critical Path Method
Re-level resources — Re-optimize resource allocation against the recovered schedule. — apply Resource Optimization

Route Optimization Pilot

integration — Overall health is red: red in resource; amber in quality, communications. red score 1.00

Perform integrated change control — Route the cross-area impacts through one controlled change decision. — Change Control Tools (reference only — no assistant yet)
Escalate to the sponsor — Bring the red areas to the sponsor for a direction and funding call. — apply Meetings

resource — 1 person over-allocated (peak ratio 1.20 — 24 h in all, 24 h of it on this project). red score 0.20

Level or smooth the resource assignments — Re-sequence or re-assign tasks so no one's remaining hours exceed their capacity. — apply Resource Optimization
Negotiate for more capacity — Secure additional hours or headcount for the over-committed assignees. — Negotiation (reference only — no assistant yet)
Revisit pre-assignments — Check whether upcoming work was pre-assigned to people already at capacity. — apply Pre Assignment

quality — Quality is unmeasured: no quality measurements are recorded for this project. amber score 1.00

Run a quality audit — Independently review whether quality processes and standards are being followed. — apply Audits
Inspect deliverables against target metrics — Re-measure the metrics closest to, or already past, tolerance to confirm state. — apply Inspection
Run a root-cause analysis — Trace out-of-tolerance or stale metrics back to the process defect driving them. — apply Root Cause Analysis

communications — Communications reporting is behind cadence: no status reporting at all (no status snapshot). amber score 1.00

Issue a fresh status report — Publish a current status snapshot so stakeholders work from live data. — apply Communication Methods
Check the reporting channel and cadence — Confirm the distribution channel and tooling aren't what's blocking reports. — apply Communication Technology
Hold a status review — Convene the team to reconcile what's actually happening against the last report. — apply Meetings

Archive Digitization

scope — 1 approved change to scope have not been re-baselined. amber score 1.00

Route the change through integrated change control — Confirm the change was board-reviewed before it is folded into the plan. — Change Control Tools (reference only — no assistant yet)
Re-baseline the WBS — Decompose the approved change into the WBS and issue a new baseline version. — apply Decomposition
Run a scope review — Reconcile approved changes against the current baseline to catch any others adrift. — Data Analysis (reference only — no assistant yet)

integration — Overall health is amber: amber in scope, cost. amber score 1.00

Perform integrated change control — Route the cross-area impacts through one controlled change decision. — Change Control Tools (reference only — no assistant yet)
Escalate to the sponsor — Bring the red areas to the sponsor for a direction and funding call. — apply Meetings

cost — Cost efficiency slipping (CPI 0.95, VAC -774). amber score 0.09

Re-estimate at completion — Recompute EAC from current CPI so the forecast reflects performance to date. — apply Earned Value Analysis
Run a cost-control reserve analysis — Weigh remaining contingency against the emerging overrun. — apply Reserve Analysis
Reconcile the funding limit — Re-phase spend against the approved funding limits. — apply Funding Limit Reconciliation